Mass-Energy Equivalence and Relativistic Kinetic Energy Revision Notes | A Level AQA Physics
E = mc² means mass and energy are equivalent and interconvertible; relativistic kinetic energy is (γ − 1)m₀c². Notes, worked examples and 15 questions answered.
Mass-Energy Equivalence and Relativistic Kinetic Energy is part of Special relativity (A-level only) in A Level AQA Physics.
7 min
Reading time
21
Lessons in this topic
A Level AQA
Pathway
Reviewed by Revise Right
Content review
What this lesson covers
E = mc² means mass and energy are equivalent and interconvertible; relativistic kinetic energy is (γ − 1)m₀c². Notes, worked examples and 15 questions answered.
State the equivalence of mass and energy using $E = mc^2$ and explain what each symbol represents
Apply the relativistic total energy equation $E = \frac{m_0 c^2}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$ to calculate total energy and relativistic kinetic energy
Explain why a massive object cannot reach the speed of light using energy and mass arguments
Describe and interpret graphs showing how relativistic mass and kinetic energy vary with speed
Key ideas to keep in view
Use this lesson to stay inside Special relativity (A-level only) while connecting the detail back to the wider Turning points in physics (A-level only) topic.
Rest energy: The energy equivalent of an object's rest mass when it is stationary, given by $E_0 = m_0 c^2$. Present even when the object has zero kinetic energy.
Rest mass ($m_0$): The invariant mass of an object measured in its own rest frame. Does not change with speed; used as the baseline in all relativistic energy calculations.
Relativistic total energy: The total energy of a moving object including rest energy, given by $E = \frac{m_0 c^2}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$. Increases without bound as $v \to c$.
Relativistic kinetic energy: The kinetic energy of a moving object calculated relativistically: $E_k = \left(\frac{m_0}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}} - m_0\right)c^2$. Diverges from the Newtonian value at speeds above roughly $0.1c$.
Revision notes
Read the core explanations from Mass-Energy Equivalence and Relativistic Kinetic Energy before testing yourself from memory.
1. The Most Famous Equation in Physics — and What It Really Means
You have almost certainly seen $E = mc^2$ written on a T-shirt or a mug. But what does it actually say about the universe? At its core, it tells you that mass and energy are not two separate things — they are two faces of the same quantity, interchangeable under the right conditions.
Before Einstein, physicists treated mass as a fixed, inert property and energy as something entirely separate. Special relativity demolished that boundary. Even a stationary object — one with zero velocity and zero kinetic energy — possesses an enormous amount of energy locked inside its mass. That stored energy is called rest energy.
Notice the scale of $c^2$: it equals $9.0 \times 10^{16}$ m$^2$ s$^{-2}$. Even a mass of 1 kg stores $9.0 \times 10^{16}$ J of rest energy — roughly equivalent to the energy released by 20 megatons of TNT. This is why nuclear reactions, which convert tiny fractions of mass into energy, release such enormous amounts of it.
The equation also works in reverse: energy has an equivalent mass. When you heat an object, its mass increases — by an immeasurably small amount at everyday temperatures, but the principle holds exactly. Mass and energy are the same conserved quantity, expressed in different units.
2. Total Energy at Speed — Introducing the Lorentz Factor
The rest energy equation is only the starting point. When an object moves, its total energy increases beyond $m_0 c^2$. To describe this, we need the full relativistic energy equation, which introduces the Lorentz factor — the same factor you met in time dilation and length contraction.
The Lorentz factor $\gamma$ is defined as $\gamma = \frac{1}{\sqrt{1 - \frac{v^2}{c^2}}}$. When $v$ is small compared with $c$, $\gamma \approx 1$ and the object behaves classically. As $v$ approaches $c$, $\gamma$ grows without limit — and so does the total energy.
You can also write this compactly as $E = \gamma m_0 c^2$. The total energy is the rest energy multiplied by the Lorentz factor. At rest, $\gamma = 1$ and $E = m_0 c^2$, recovering the rest energy equation exactly — a reassuring consistency check.
The relativistic kinetic energy $E_k$ is then the difference between the total energy and the rest energy. Subtracting $m_0 c^2$ from both sides gives the kinetic contribution alone.
3. Worked Calculations — Applying the Equations
The equations look dense, but the method is always the same: calculate $\gamma$ first, then multiply by $m_0 c^2$. Let's walk through a full example so the process becomes automatic.
Worked example: Calculating relativistic kinetic energy at $0.8c$
An electron has rest mass $m_0 = 9.11 \times 10^{-31}$ kg and travels at $v = 0.8c$. Calculate its relativistic kinetic energy. ($c = 3.0 \times 10^8$ m/s) [4 marks]
$\frac{v^2}{c^2} = (0.8)^2 = 0.8 \times 0.8 = 0.64$ — Because $v = 0.8c$, the ratio $v/c = 0.8$ exactly. Squaring: $0.8 \times 0.8 = 0.64$. [M1]
$E_k^{\text{Newton}} = \frac{1}{2}m_0 v^2 = \frac{1}{2} \times 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times (0.8 \times 3.0 \times 10^8)^2$
$= \frac{1}{2} \times 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times (2.4 \times 10^8)^2$
$= \frac{1}{2} \times 9.11 \times 10^{-31} \times 5.76 \times 10^{16}$
$= 2.62 \times 10^{-14}$ J — $(2.4 \times 10^8)^2 = 2.4 \times 10^8 \times 2.4 \times 10^8 = 5.76 \times 10^{16}$. The Newtonian result ($2.62 \times 10^{-14}$ J) is roughly half the relativistic result ($5.47 \times 10^{-14}$ J) — confirming that at $0.8c$ the Newtonian formula significantly underestimates kinetic energy. [A1]
Answer: $E_k = 5.47 \times 10^{-14}$ J (relativistic); Newtonian formula gives only $2.62 \times 10^{-14}$ J — a significant underestimate at $0.8c$.
That comparison in Step 5 is worth pausing on. At $0.8c$, the relativistic kinetic energy is more than twice the Newtonian prediction. Particle accelerators operate in exactly this regime, which is why their designers must use relativistic equations — Newtonian mechanics would give completely wrong answers for the energies involved.
4. Graphs of Mass and Kinetic Energy Against Speed
The AQA specification requires you to describe and interpret graphs showing how relativistic mass and kinetic energy vary with speed. These graphs carry a powerful physical message: approaching the speed of light demands infinite energy, which is why no massive object can ever reach it.
Some treatments use the concept of relativistic mass $m = \gamma m_0$, which increases with speed. Although modern physics prefers to keep mass as the invariant rest mass $m_0$ and attribute the increase to momentum and energy, the AQA specification uses the relativistic mass picture for graph interpretation, so we will work with it here.
The shape of this graph is the key exam point. From $v = 0$ up to about $0.3c$, the curve is nearly flat — relativistic mass barely differs from rest mass. Beyond $0.5c$ the curve rises steeply, and as $v \to c$ the relativistic mass tends towards infinity. The curve never reaches $v = c$ on the horizontal axis because that would require infinite mass.
The kinetic energy graph shows two curves that start together at low speeds and diverge dramatically above $0.5c$. The Newtonian curve ($\frac{1}{2}m_0 v^2$) grows as a simple parabola and would predict a finite kinetic energy at $v = c$. The relativistic curve shoots upward without limit as $v \to c$, demonstrating that infinite energy would be required to reach the speed of light.
When describing these graphs in an exam, use the language of asymptotes: the relativistic mass and kinetic energy curves are asymptotic to the vertical line $v = c$. The curves approach but never reach $v = c$, confirming that $c$ is an absolute speed limit for any object with rest mass.
5. Why a Massive Object Can Never Reach the Speed of Light
The graphs make the argument visually, but it is worth stating the reasoning explicitly because AQA exam questions often ask you to explain — not just describe — the speed limit.
As an object's speed increases towards $c$, the denominator $\sqrt{1 - v^2/c^2}$ approaches zero. This makes $\gamma$ grow without bound, and therefore both the total energy $E = \gamma m_0 c^2$ and the kinetic energy $E_k = (\gamma - 1)m_0 c^2$ tend towards infinity. No finite energy source can supply an infinite amount of energy, so $v = c$ is unattainable for any object with $m_0 > 0$.
Photons, by contrast, have zero rest mass ($m_0 = 0$). The formula $E = \gamma m_0 c^2$ would give $0/0$ for a photon, which is why photons are described by a different relation ($E = hf$). They travel at $c$ precisely because they have no rest mass to resist acceleration.
6. Comparing Newtonian and Relativistic Kinetic Energy
A common exam task is to compare the two expressions for kinetic energy and evaluate when each is appropriate. The table below sets out the key differences clearly.
Feature
Newtonian $E_k = \frac{1}{2}m_0 v^2$
Relativistic $E_k = (\gamma - 1)m_0 c^2$
Valid range
Speeds well below $c$ (roughly $v < 0.1c$)
All speeds up to (but not including) $c$
Behaviour as $v \to c$
Predicts finite $E_k = \frac{1}{2}m_0 c^2$ at $v = c$
Predicts $E_k \to \infty$ as $v \to c$
Graph shape
Parabola (quadratic in $v$)
Curve that rises steeply and is asymptotic to $v = c$
The critical point for evaluation questions is that the Newtonian formula is not wrong — it is an approximation that works extremely well at low speeds. At $v = 0.1c$, the two formulas agree to within about 0.75%. At $v = 0.5c$, the relativistic value is already 24% larger than the Newtonian prediction. By $v = 0.9c$, the Newtonian formula underestimates kinetic energy by a factor of approximately 3.2.
7. Exam Technique and Mark-Winning Guidance
Mass-energy equivalence and relativistic kinetic energy appear in the Turning Points topic, which is assessed at A-level only. Questions tend to combine calculation with conceptual explanation, so you need both the arithmetic and the reasoning.
For extended-response questions asking you to evaluate the two kinetic energy models, structure your answer as: (1) state that both agree at low speeds; (2) explain the divergence at high speeds with reference to $\gamma$; (3) state the physical consequence — infinite energy barrier at $v = c$; (4) give a conclusion about which model applies in a given context. This four-point structure reliably covers the marking points.
Worked example: Exam-style: Calculate total energy and kinetic energy of a proton at $0.6c$
A proton has rest mass $m_0 = 1.67 \times 10^{-27}$ kg and travels at $v = 0.6c$. Calculate (a) its total relativistic energy and (b) its relativistic kinetic energy. ($c = 3.0 \times 10^8$ m/s) [5 marks]
$E_k = E - m_0 c^2 = 1.879 \times 10^{-10} - 1.503 \times 10^{-10}$
$= 0.376 \times 10^{-10}$
$= 3.76 \times 10^{-11}$ J — Alternatively: $E_k = (\gamma - 1)m_0 c^2 = 0.25 \times 1.503 \times 10^{-10} = 3.76 \times 10^{-11}$ J. Both routes give the same answer. [A1]
Answer: (a) Total energy $E = 1.88 \times 10^{-10}$ J; (b) Relativistic kinetic energy $E_k = 3.76 \times 10^{-11}$ J
These two worked examples cover the full range of what AQA can ask on this topic: a single-step kinetic energy calculation, a two-part total-and-kinetic energy question, and a comparison with the Newtonian prediction. Practise each method until the $\gamma$-first approach is automatic.
Sources and content standards
Published by Revise Right. Use the official specification reference to check the requirements for your course.
E = mc² means mass and energy are equivalent and interconvertible. The rest energy of an object is E₀ = m₀ c², so even 1 kg at rest stores 9.0 × 10¹⁶ J, which is why nuclear reactions converting tiny fractions of mass into energy release such enormous amounts of it.
What is the rest energy of an electron?
The rest energy of an electron is about 8.20 × 10⁻¹⁴ J, from m₀c² with a rest mass of 9.11 × 10⁻³¹ kg and c² = 9.0 × 10¹⁶ m² s⁻². Multiplying this rest energy by the Lorentz factor gives the electron's total energy when it moves.
How do you calculate relativistic kinetic energy?
Relativistic kinetic energy is (γ − 1)m₀c², the total energy minus the rest energy. For an electron at 0.8c, γ = 1 ÷ 0.6 = 1.667 and m₀c² = 8.20 × 10⁻¹⁴ J, so the kinetic energy is 0.667 × 8.20 × 10⁻¹⁴ = 5.47 × 10⁻¹⁴ J.
What is rest energy?
Rest energy is the energy an object has locked inside its mass even when stationary, with zero velocity and zero kinetic energy. It is given by E₀ = m₀c², where m₀ is the rest mass in kg and c = 3.0 × 10⁸ m/s; when the object moves, its total energy increases beyond this.
What is relativistic mass?
Relativistic mass is m = γm₀, a quantity that increases with speed. Modern physics prefers to keep mass as the invariant rest mass and attribute the increase to momentum and energy, but the relativistic mass picture is still used when interpreting graphs of mass against speed.
What is the relativistic total energy equation?
Relativistic total energy is E = γm₀ c² = m₀ c² ÷ √(1 − v²/c²). At rest γ = 1, giving the rest energy m₀ c². For a proton at 0.6c, γ = 1.25, so E = 1.25 × 1.503 × 10⁻¹⁰ = 1.88 × 10⁻¹⁰ J.
Why can't anything with mass reach the speed of light?
An object with mass cannot reach the speed of light because as v approaches c, √(1 − v²/c²) approaches zero and γ grows without bound. Total energy and kinetic energy then tend towards infinity, and no finite energy source can supply an infinite amount of energy.
When does the Newtonian kinetic energy formula stop working?
The Newtonian formula, ½m₀ v², works well at low speeds but fails as v approaches c. At 0.1c the two formulas agree to within about 0.75%, at 0.5c the relativistic value is 24% larger, and by 0.9c the Newtonian formula underestimates kinetic energy by a factor of about 3.2.
How much energy is in 1 kg of mass?
A mass of 1 kg stores 9.0 × 10¹⁶ J of rest energy, from E = mc² with c² = 9.0 × 10¹⁶ m² s⁻². That is roughly equivalent to the energy released by 20 megatons of TNT, which is why nuclear reactions, converting tiny fractions of mass into energy, release such enormous amounts.
Does heating an object increase its mass?
Heating an object does increase its mass, because energy has an equivalent mass under E = mc². At everyday temperatures the increase is immeasurably small, but the principle holds exactly: mass and energy are the same conserved quantity, expressed in different units.
What does a graph of relativistic mass against speed look like?
A graph of relativistic mass against speed is nearly flat from v = 0 up to about 0.3c, then rises steeply beyond 0.5c and tends towards infinity as v approaches c. The curve is asymptotic to the vertical line v = c and never reaches it, because that would require infinite mass.
Why can photons travel at the speed of light?
Photons can travel at c because they have zero rest mass, so they have no rest mass to resist acceleration. The formula E = γm₀c² would give 0/0 for a photon, which is why photons are described by a different relation, E = hf.
What is the total energy of a proton at 0.6c?
A proton of rest mass 1.67 × 10⁻²⁷ kg at 0.6c has a total energy of about 1.88 × 10⁻¹⁰ J. Here γ = 1 ÷ √0.64 = 1.25 and the rest energy is 1.503 × 10⁻¹⁰ J, so E = 1.25 × 1.503 × 10⁻¹⁰ J and the kinetic energy is 3.76 × 10⁻¹¹ J.
Why do particle accelerators need relativistic equations?
Particle accelerators need relativistic equations because their particles reach speeds where Newtonian mechanics gives completely wrong energies. At 0.8c, an electron's relativistic kinetic energy, 5.47 × 10⁻¹⁴ J, is more than twice the Newtonian value of 2.62 × 10⁻¹⁴ J.
What does the relativistic kinetic energy graph show?
The relativistic kinetic energy graph agrees with the Newtonian parabola at low speeds but diverges dramatically beyond 0.5c, shooting upward without limit as v approaches c. It is asymptotic to v = c, showing infinite energy would be needed to reach the speed of light, while the Newtonian curve predicts a finite ½m₀c².